On Thu, January 4, 2007 22:56, Magnus Danielson said:
>> Can't wait for a civilian L2.....................

> freq receiver. In future we might actually see L2/L5 receivers with no L1
> since
> that might actually be more economic. L2 and L5 is only 51.15 MHz apart

But you actually want the carriers far away from each other to get a good
iono compensation. Do not know much you will actually loose doing a L2/L5
recevier instead.

--

   Björn


_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts

Reply via email to