It was also interesting to note that there were four stations within 1Hz, on three of the four bands, and all four were over 1Hz high on W1AW 40 meters.
The station that copied both 40 meters signals to less than 1Hz was off by more than 1Hz on the other two bands. Here are my results if any one wants to fill in call signs on the spread sheet. In the old FMT days call signs were published with the results. 160 -0.27 80 -0.45 40 -1.13 WA6ZTY 40 -0.07 Connie K5CM Oklahoma -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Mike Fahmie Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2007 11:59 AM To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement Subject: Re: [time-nuts] FMT Results Published ! At 07:05 AM 3/7/2007, you wrote: >Mike Fahmie wrote: > > 2006 FMT results have appeared at: > > > > http://www.arrl.org/w1aw/fmt/2006/2006-fmt-results.html > > > >It is curious that none of us managed to be within 1 Hz on 3 bands. I >missed out by 1.4 Hz on 40M ... but then there were a lot of us who >measured on the low side on 40 relative to the umpire. > > >-Joe KM1P > Boston MA There are a number of things that point toward W1AW being about a hertz high. 1.) Though W1AW received nearly 3 times as many 40M reports as WA6ZTY, each had nearly the same number of reports in the <1 Hz group, but W1AW had 4 times as many in the 1 to 5 Hz group. 2.) If you look at entries who were in the <1 Hz group on other measurements, they were all about 1 Hz low on W1AW's 40 M signal. 3.) Only one person who copied WA6ZTY <1 Hz copied W1AW <1 Hz. -Mike- _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list [email protected] https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list [email protected] https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
