Magnus Danielson wrote: > > I'm considering putting that new and shiny audio analyzer to some alternative > use that I bought at work. Preferences towards BNC, XLR or Banana-jacks > anyone? > :) > > I was just looking at the 3048 manuals the other night. Bumped into a new site > with HP manuals I haven't seen before. > > Cheers, > Magnus > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > >
Magnus Balanced low frequency signal transmission with shielded cables is easier with XLR connectors, provided one uses 1 connector per channel. Enrico's paper on the use of counters to measure frequency stability http://www.femto-st.fr/~rubiola/journal-articles/rubiola2005rsi-hi-res-freq-counters.pdf <http://www.femto-st.fr/%7Erubiola/journal-articles/rubiola2005rsi-hi-res-freq-counters.pdf> Shows why the SR620 is preferable to the Agilent 53332A/53331A and the Pendulum counters for this application. Using the HP5370A/B or other time interval counters in the picket fence mode is also OK. The cost of the SR620 highlights the need for a relatively inexpensive reasonably high resolution timer counter or time stamp device for such applications. Bruce _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list [email protected] https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
