Peter Vince wrote: > It's a shame the magazine article got it so wrong, but I can well > imagine how an enthusiastic amateur, without the collective knowledge > of our little group, might, with all good intentions, make such a > mess of the design. > > I wonder if Bruce, or one of the other experts in our group, should > write to the magazine pointing out the major flaws, hence spreading > our knowledge for the greater good? (Hmmm, that sounds pompous - > sorry!) > > Peter Vince >
Peter I've already sent an email pointing out the circuit errors (complete with the fixes - which only require a few jumpers eliminate use of a few of the inverters) and the flawed concept. This was about a month ago, either the email went astray or they've chosen to ignore it. Maybe I'll send another email. Bruce _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list [email protected] https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
