I'll try that out, and let you know how it goes!
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David McGaw Sent: Monday, June 25, 2007 11:32 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement Subject: Re: [time-nuts] 1 PPS visual Test Using "Normal" triggering, any digital scope will allow you to see the 1PPS edges clearly. Most analog scopes should have enough brightness at reasonably high sweep rate to see the edges in a darkened room or using a hood. Turn the brightness up to just below the point where a steady dot is seen on the screen with no trigger. David At 01:02 PM 6/25/2007, you wrote: >Randy, >and that's what I'm looking for, the actual measurement isn't that >important, the fidelity of the pulse is. The concern is, that if I over >drive the out put amplifiers of the distribution amps, I can make a >VERY ugly picture, much like taking a five MHz sine wave, and turning >it into a "dirty" semi square wave generator. > >Raimond > >-----Original Message----- >From: Randy Warner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Monday, June 25, 2007 10:57 >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'Discussion of precise time and >frequency measurement' >Subject: RE: [time-nuts] 1 PPS visual Test > >Raimond, > >About the only thing you can do is put the scope in normal trigger >mode, looking for a positive going transition. If you set the >horizontal sweep at about 1mS/cm you should see the rising edge of the >pulse once per second. If you have an old scope without any storage >capability the image will naturally fade quickly. This may take some >tweaking on the trigger settings for the scope, but you should be able >to find a combination of trigger settings and horizontal division size that will work. > >If your scope's trigger circuitry is stable enough you should be able >to decrease the horizontal division size so that you can get a general >idea of what the leading edge of the 1PPS pulse looks like. Depending >on the receiver it should have a very fast rise-time and be a smooth ramp. > >Naturally, you will not be able to make any measurements as to the >accuracy of the pulse, but this will give you a quick health check. > >Best regards, > >Randy Warner >Senior Applications Engineer >Geodetics, Inc. >858.729.0872 > >-----Original Message----- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On >Behalf Of Raimond Melkers >Sent: Monday, June 25, 2007 8:43 AM >To: 'Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement' >Subject: [time-nuts] 1 PPS visual > > Any suggestions on the simplest, semi inexpensive way, to be able to >look at a one Pulse Per Second wave form? It's seems that most >oscilloscopes will not let me look that low in frequency. Basically I >want to know, and see if I have a pure, clean 1 PPS waveform. > >thanks, >Raimond > > > >_______________________________________________ >time-nuts mailing list >[email protected] >https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > > > > >_______________________________________________ >time-nuts mailing list >[email protected] >https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list [email protected] https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list [email protected] https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
