); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Wow, as a member of the 5071 cesium R&D team, I couldn't imagine
a homebrew cesium standard.  There is so much knowledge involved
in building one, plus you need high vacuum equipment, etc.  "Big"
cesiums like NIST-7 have a group of post docs to tend to them.

Now you did say "primary" but if you were willing to look at secondary
standards, a Rb might just barely be possible if you can somehow
get the glassware.  I also designed a Rb and there is much to learn
there as well, although a lot less than cesium.

Ask someone else about H masers and homebrewing.  Don't know much
about those.  They seem "simple" to me, as an ignorant bystander.

Rick Karlquist



michael taylor wrote:
> ); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
> Errors-To:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Has there been any attempts (or successes) at someone outside of a
> national laboratory, and commercial R&D groups to build a primary
> frequency/time standard?
>
> I am not sure if there is anything that would prevent an individual
> from building a cesium standard of the quality seen in early models
> from NPL and NIST, or an industrial style (compact Ramsey cavity)
> standard.
>
> -Michael
>
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected]
> To unsubscribe, go to
> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.
>
>



_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Reply via email to