Or at least that provides a reason to question the "inherited design"..
On 8/15/09 5:32 PM, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi James, > > the kind of experience that makes one a better engineer :) > > bye, > Said > > > In a message dated 8/15/2009 14:35:41 Pacific Daylight Time, > [email protected] writes: > > > Yes.. In our case, though, I think the microphonics were from movement of > the cavity lid, which wasn't very rigid. The lid moved, moving the tuning > screw, which moved the little tuning plate suspended over the ceramic puck. > It was a prototype to be sure, so the production item wouldn't be as bad, > but that sort of thing convinced me that anything we could do to reduce the > amount of touch labor needed was to the better. > > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. > _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
