Hi Chuck:
I think it comes from the way schematics are labeled.
If you use 1.8 k Ohms the point may not be seen since "." is easy to miss.
But if you use 1k8 there's no question about the meaning.
Have Fun,
Brooke Clarke
http://www.PRC68.com
Chuck Harris wrote:
Ok, I'm going nuts. Why are you guys using such a
perverse way of indicating frequency?
I was of the understanding that SI specified you display
1.0MHz as 1.0MHz, or 1,0MHz. But not 1M0 Hz.
What's the story?
-Chuck Harris
Greg Broburg wrote:
In looking at the CRD idea, it is not obvious to me how either
of the 16M0 Hz or the 10M0 Hz signal would contain any
relevant energy that would give the precision necessary for
the desired ideal result.
The only harmonic relationship that I can see is to square up
the clean analog and divide by 13 down to 2M0 Hz, thence use
the 5th and 8th harmonics at 10M0 and 16M0 but then why
use the 16M0 at all?
I expect that I am missing something obvious here
a little nudge may help.
Regards;
Greg
_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
