Perhaps. But FCC may also be saying, "We're beginning to think it *won't*work and need to cut ourselves some slack."
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 9:31 AM, J. L. Trantham <[email protected]> wrote: > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On > Behalf Of Pete Lancashire > Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2011 8:23 AM > To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement > Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Light squared on NPR > > > looks like NPR has a few > > search Lightsquared on npr.org > > I still like the FCC's bit on interference so far > > Despite the test results released so far, the FCC insists the interference > questions are far from settled. "Some of the tests to date may have relied > on different assumptions, metrics and mitigation assumptions, and so may > not > accurately reflect the potential for interference as a result of how the > network may be operated," the agency said. > > > > Translation: > > We still think this thing can work. > > Joe > > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe, go to > https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. > _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
