Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
In message<[email protected]>, Chuck Harris writes:
Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
I can see a 20 year prediction being seriously fraught with error.
Not really, starting out with just one leap second every 18 months
gets you pretty good first approximation. DUT1 would probably still
be less than 3 seconds.
I would be happy with a solution that didn't shift my local noon by
more than what the time-zones do already... Now if we could just do
away with daylight savings time.
I am not at all happy with the idea of
having it magically stall, or stutter. That's something for some
library function to keep track of after the fact.
That is exactly my point: With 6 months notice, getting the
libraries updated using regular software update channels is not
feasible.
We are in complete agreement on that!
-Chuck Harris
_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
