Hi Jim:

The problem I'm having is that just counting the clicks from a source is a way to get random numbers. If you average the clicks over a large amount of time and plot that average, it will decrease over time. So to see the change in decay rate the source needs to have a short half-life.

The article mentions (ordered by half life):
manganese-54 (312.03 days or 26.9E6 sec)
cesium-137 (30.17 years)
silicon-32 (170 years or 5.4E9 sec)
radium-226  (1601 years)

manganese-54 looks like the shortest half life that was mentioned and it's avaialble from United Nucular:
http://unitednuclear.com/index.php?main_page=product_info&cPath=2_5&products_id=819
Here's their table of Disk Sources which has some isotopes that have a shorter half life:
*Cobalt^57 *270 days
*Zinc^65 *244 days
*Polonium^210 * 138 days (also available as a needle source)

So in the disk sources Polonium-210 has the shortest half life.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polonium

ISOTOPE         ACTIVITY        HALF-LIFE       ENERGIES (KeV)
*Barium^133 *   1uCi    10.7 years      *Gamma: *81.0, 356.0
*Cadmium^109 *  1uCi    453 days        *Gamma: *88.0
*Cesium^137 *   *1*uCi  30.1 years      *Gamma: *32, 661.6
*Beta: *511.6, 1173.2
*Cesium^137 *   *5*uCi  30.1 years      *Gamma: *32, 661.6
*Beta: * 511.6, 1173.2
*Cesium^137 *   *10*uCi         30.1 years      *Gamma: *32, 661.6
*Beta:* 511.6, 1173.2
*Cobalt^57 *    1uCi    270 days        *Gamma: *122.1
*Cobalt^60 *    1uCi    5.27 years      *Gamma: *1173.2, 1332.5
*Europium^152 *         1uCi    13.5 years      *Gamma: *121.8, 344.3, 1408.0
*Manganese^54 *         1uCi    312 days        *Gamma: *834.8
*Sodium^22 *    1uCi    2.6 years       *Gamma: *511.0, 1274.5
*Strontium^90 *         0.1uCi  28.5 years      *Beta: *546.0
*Thallium^204 *         1uCi    3.78 years      *Beta: *763.4
* Polonium^210 *        0.1uCi  138 days        *Alpha: *5304.5
*Zinc^65 *      1uCi    244 days        *Gamma: *511.0, 1115.5


Have Fun,

Brooke Clarke
http://www.PRC68.com
http://www.End2PartyGovernment.com/


Jim Lux wrote:
On 8/3/11 12:14 PM, J. Forster wrote:
Hi Brooke,

Maybe. The photon counting gear is pretty trivial. You'd need:

A scintillator
A PMT (Photo Multiplier Tube) and HV stable HV PS.
A preamp
A SCA (Single Channel Analyzer). These can be built.
A counter, stable time base, and data recorder

The main difficulty, IMO, would be getting a sufficient sized lump of the
material. Chunks of Cs don't grow on trees, at least not where I live.


Does it have to be Cs? United Nuclear sells a wide variety of calibration sources for <$100. Yes, they have Cs137 (10 microCuries)...



_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Reply via email to