Yes, if you use statistics then you must be slow or, better, stop and collect data. I think that ionosphere movements that cause errors are slower than robots movements so it is hard to collect enough data for statistics, of course maybe that only two points to average out is better than nothing...
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 7:43 AM, Chris Albertson <[email protected]>wrote: > I think the accuracy could be quite good if you took advantage of the > times the robot was motionless. During those times it could build up > many seconds of averaging and then while moving either use dead > reckoning or inertial navigation. > > On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 4:01 AM, ehydra <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi all! > > > > I wonder what would be reasonable location accuracy if two cheap same > type > > GPS modules will be several meters apart? I understand that it involves > > statistical numbers. > > > > Any idea? Say for a small robot. > > > > Thanks! > > - Henry > > > > > > -- > > ehydra.dyndns.info > > > > _______________________________________________ > > time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected] > > To unsubscribe, go to > > https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > > and follow the instructions there. > > > > > > -- > > Chris Albertson > Redondo Beach, California > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe, go to > https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. > _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
