"Real time TV these days is only RELATIVELY real time."

Well there goes the credibility of reality TV for me!

Tom Holmes, N8ZM
Tipp City, OH
EM79


> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On
> Behalf Of David I. Emery
> Sent: Monday, January 02, 2012 12:09 AM
> To: [email protected]; Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [time-nuts] US New Year countdown - accurate?
> 
> On Sun, Jan 01, 2012 at 05:54:46PM -0800, J. Forster wrote:
> > To me the ball drop/fireworks was different from the on-screen time on
FOX
> > by a few secnds.
> 
>       I was watching the media pool HD satellite feed on AMC-1 and
> through a broadcast grade IRD (ex PBS Bitlink ) it appeared to be about
> 2 seconds slow relative to  my house NTP timing.   This would about
> exactly match what I would expect for uplink encoder, satellite path,
> and decoder delays.
> 
>       I would expect a TV station using that feed might add anywhere
> from 1-6 seconds to the delay in their internal processing to OTA... and
> a digital cable system might add further delay to that (couple of more
> seconds at least).
> 
>       Real time TV these days is only RELATIVELY real time.
> 
> 
> --
>   Dave Emery N1PRE/AE, [email protected]  DIE Consulting, Weston, Mass
> 02493
> "An empty zombie mind with a forlorn barely readable weatherbeaten
> 'For Rent' sign still vainly flapping outside on the weed encrusted pole -
in
> celebration of what could have been, but wasn't and is not to be now
either."
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected]
> To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.


_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Reply via email to