p...@phk.freebsd.dk said: >> Hmm... do you mean you want to store all samples of an hour and then >> avarage over it?
> That would be the ideal way to do it, since it would make one heck of a comb > filter and eliminate pretty much anything else. That only works if your reference clock is stable enough over the collecting period. I'm far from a DSP wizard. Assume I have a signal at 100 kHz with a bandwidth of 1 kHz. (or pick any numbers you like) How many samples per second do I need? How stable does my sampling clock need to be if I collect data for for N seconds? Is "stable" the right term? What's the right way to think about the question I'm trying to ask? -- These are my opinions, not necessarily my employer's. I hate spam. _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- email@example.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.