Hi

First order immune due to the OCXO. You still have the RF stuff hanging out 
there in what ever breeze comes along. The OCXO does indeed change a bit if you 
go from still air to a raging blast. Not as much as a TCXO, but there is a 
shift.

Bob

On Dec 16, 2012, at 8:56 PM, [email protected] wrote:

> One more thing the Thunderbolt is essentially immune from since there is no 
> separate XO for the GPS receiver which runs from the OCXO.
> 
> Didier
> 
> Sent from my Droid Razr 4G LTE wireless tracker.
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Said Jackson <[email protected]>
> To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement <[email protected]>
> Cc: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement <[email protected]>
> Sent: Sun, 16 Dec 2012 7:16 PM
> Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Z3805A cooling requirements?
> 
> One item I forgot to mention:
> 
> One of the most airflow sensitive parts inside a GPSDO is the tcxo used on 
> the GPS receiver. Some GPS don't even use a tcxo, just an XO. They shall 
> remain unnamed.
> 
> Just lightly blowing on an M12+ GPS will make it lose lock immediatly.
> 
> This is easy to try for time nuts, and to verify the sensitivity to airflow.
> 
> Bye,
> Said
> 
> Sent from my iPad
> 
> On Dec 16, 2012, at 4:37 PM, Said Jackson <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> Bob,
>> 
>> We agree that Ocxos get real bad real fast if overheated. Not a problem in 
>> the Z3805A box when run on a desk without clogging the vent holes, which is 
>> how this thread started (do I need a fan for my Z3805A...)
>> 
>> Your stability numbers are very optimistic. There are very few single oven 
>> Ocxos with 10ppb peak over 100C. Typical numbers are +/-2.5E-08 -see for 
>> example the MTI 230 series, or +/-5E-08 for the Morion MV103 series. Is it 
>> possible? Yes. Our Mini-JLT single oven has +/-5E-09 from -40C to +85C 
>> stability. But that uses an exceptional and quite expensive single oven Ocxo 
>> with SC cut crystal.
>> 
>> How about 0.3ppb over -30C to +70C? That's not standard by any means, very 
>> few vendors can do that. Heck even the CSAC doesn't even get close to that 
>> (its rated at +/-1ppb over that temp range). The best eurocan Docxo we offer 
>> has +/-0.2ppb over that range for a total of 0.4ppb. and it costs a huge 
>> amount of $$$. So which parts are you referring to here?
>> 
>> We have done extensive tests here on exactly this issue: how do real life 
>> Ocxos react to varying airflow. Any airflow causes turbulence, so even 
>> constant airflow varies in this sense. All I can say is "not well at all". 
>> Tom Van Back has done some testing on our FireFly-1A GPSDO some years ago 
>> including tests with a fan, he may be willing to share the results of that 
>> test. The FF-1A has a spec of +/-25ppb over temp, so it's a "typical" SOCXO 
>> in our opinion.
>> 
>> Lastly, don't forget that it's not just the ocxo that's airflow sensitive, 
>> the DAC, filters, amp, and DAC reference all are thermally sensitive and 
>> will be affected by airflow as well.
>> 
>> The answer to this discussion would be easy to get: put a fan inside the 
>> Z3805A and check its adev with and without the fan. I am willing to bet a 
>> GPSTCXO eval kit that all else being the same the fan version will have 
>> higher noise (ADEV an PN). If the 58503A or Z3815A desktop versions needed a 
>> fan, I am sure HP would have designed one into it..
>> 
>> Bye,
>> Said
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Sent from my iPad
>> 
>> On Dec 16, 2012, at 3:38 PM, Bob Camp <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi
>>> 
>>> Ok where to start.
>>> 
>>> Some typical numbers:
>>> 
>>> A DOCXO likely will be specified at around 0.3 ppb peak to peak over -30 to 
>>> +70C. That comes out to 0.003 ppb per degree. A single OCOX likely will be 
>>> specified at around 10 ppb peak to peak over -30 to +70C. That's 0.1 ppb 
>>> per degree. Yes, there are a number of variations, but those numbers are 
>>> not at all crazy. eBay will happy cough up a lot of parts with those sort 
>>> of numbers on them. 
>>> 
>>> ---------------------------
>>> 
>>> Both devices will heat the crystal to a constant temperature when the 
>>> ambient (however it's measured) is in the range of -30 to +70C. If it's 
>>> below -30, there may not be enough oven power to heat the crystal. More 
>>> likely there's not enough power to warm it up in the specified warmup time. 
>>> If the ambient is above +70, even by a few degrees, the crystal can 
>>> overheat. Exactly what temperature it starts to overheat is a function of 
>>> several things, mainly the tolerances on cutting process of the crystal. 
>>> When it does overheat, it's likely to move 10 to 20 ppb per degree for that 
>>> first degree. That's *way* more than you would ever want to see.
>>> 
>>> It would be nice if control loops had no noise, and if the crystal heated 
>>> and cooled at the same rate. In fact, you have enough heater power to run 
>>> things up at a very high rate (you want to warm the thing up very quickly). 
>>> The cooling rate at the hot end is "not so fast" (small delta T = low heat 
>>> flow) .  A noise spike that gets the crystal too hot, will hang around for 
>>> a while. You can have short term stability trouble before the oven is fully 
>>> shut off.
>>> 
>>> Simply put - OCXO's don't play nice beyond their upper ambient spec. 
>>> 
>>> -------------------------
>>> 
>>> In most gear, there's a fan, and it runs all the time. It may speed up a 
>>> bit when things get real hot, but that's about it. With a fan like that, 
>>> when the ambient moves a degree or two, the inside of the box moves a 
>>> degree or two. There is no catastrophe when the fan suddenly comes on. If 
>>> anything most variable speed fan setups result in the innards of the box 
>>> seeing less temperature change rather than more. Thermally, fans are a good 
>>> idea. 
>>> 
>>> ------------------------
>>> 
>>> Now, taking those numbers (and a few assumptions, and the numbers from the 
>>> previous post):
>>> 
>>> Let's say your gizmo does have a case that's 22C above ambient. Let's also 
>>> say there is no fan. Let's also assume that there's something else in the 
>>> box. It's pretty common for the "stuff" in a box to heat it up by 20C or 
>>> more with no fan (The "ambient" inside the box is 20C above the outside 
>>> air). If the gizmo is in the box, it's case is now 44C above the outside 
>>> air. 
>>> 
>>> deep breath….
>>> 
>>> If the outside air is at 30C, your gizmo is at 74C. If it's an OCXO with a 
>>> 70C upper end rating, it could be in trouble. The rest of the box is 
>>> perfectly happy. It's designed with 70C rated parts and the spec on the box 
>>> is 50C max.  
>>> 
>>> Yes, that's a lot of this and that. Yes there are some assumptions 
>>> sprinkled here and there. Without assuming a few things there's not much 
>>> way to get to a rational conclusion. Are OCXO's a bit strange thermally - 
>>> yes of course they are. An eBay surplus rubidium is even stranger. Power 
>>> transistors have issues as well. Stuff that has power associated with it 
>>> needs some attention as part of the thermal design….
>>> 
>>> ---------------------------
>>> 
>>> Are big / noisy / shaky / power hungry fans a good thing - of course not. 
>>> They are simply the most common way to solve thermal problems in equipment. 
>>> These days you can get fans that are less big/noisy/shaky than they once 
>>> were. It's still better to not use them *if* you have all your thermal 
>>> ducks in a row. That means you have the full specification on the OCXO (and 
>>> likely a few other things). 
>>> 
>>> If we're talking about surplus gear or parts - you are not going to have a 
>>> lot of information. The only reasonable assumption you can make is that the 
>>> eBay OCXO is rated for moving air. Assuming you know the upper ambient of 
>>> the OCXO, check it's actual case temperature. Keep it below the specified 
>>> max ambient. Ideally, keep it 10 C or more below the rated upper ambient. 
>>> The short term stability likely will be better ….
>>> 
>>> Bob 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Dec 16, 2012, at 2:22 PM, Said Jackson <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Hi Volker,
>>>> 
>>>> You are correct on that.
>>>> 
>>>> Bob is right in that thermal sensitivity is measured in a thermal chamber 
>>>> with constant airflow at a very constant rate and temperature. While this 
>>>> works, it is also somewhat unrealistic because who is going to set up a 
>>>> thermal chamber for their ocxo in the field?
>>>> 
>>>> Because of that many companies put airflow shields on top of the ocxo in 
>>>> the test chamber to simulate more real life conditions where massive 
>>>> airflow is not happening, and self heating needs to be taken into 
>>>> consideration.
>>>> 
>>>> Moving-air skews the operating power of the ocxo as it removes heat from 
>>>> the ocxo. Thus a manufacturer could claim +75C max operating temp inside a 
>>>> test chamber, but if you try to operate in still air at 75C in a small 
>>>> enclosure your ocxo would overheat quickly due to the internal power 
>>>> consumption adding to the ambient temperature. Thus the test chamber 
>>>> actually works to "cool" the ocxo by removing excess heat and keeping its 
>>>> case at 75C no matter how much power is consumed inside the ocxo.
>>>> 
>>>> As an example of this consider that a typical DOCXO runs at 55C case temp 
>>>> in still air with 22C ambient. Now say that Docxo has 1E-010 per degree C 
>>>> thermal sensitivity (not a great docxo.. But thats actually better than 
>>>> the spec of the ocxo used on the Mini-T: that one is 10ppb from 0C to 60 C 
>>>> as far as I know)
>>>> 
>>>> What happens when I turn on a strong fan right next to the Docxo? The fan 
>>>> will throw ambient air at the same 22C temperature at the unit, and 
>>>> immediately start cooling off the 55C case of the ocxo due to the temp 
>>>> difference between the ocxo case and ambient air.
>>>> 
>>>> The result? If the fan can cool off the Docxo to say 30C, we have had a 
>>>> massive 25C temperature change shock on the docxo without a single C temp 
>>>> change in ambient air!
>>>> 
>>>> Now 25C * 1E-010/C = 2.5E-09 change in frequency which gives a 2.5ns/s 
>>>> drift rate just because the fan switched on!
>>>> 
>>>> Typical single oven ocxos will have about 1ppb per C sensitivity, so the 
>>>> above example would result in 25ns/s drift just because the fan came on. 
>>>> Thats really bad for Gpsdo type performance expectations, and will 
>>>> certainly ruin your ADEV performance which us time-nuts expect to be 
>>>> around 1E-012 not 2E-08 for a good gpsdo :)
>>>> 
>>>> Hope this shows why a fan on an ocxo is not a good idea.
>>>> 
>>>> Bye,
>>>> Said
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On Dec 16, 2012, at 9:47, Volker Esper <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Indeed? I didn't expect that. There are people who say, that the control 
>>>>> loop of OCXOs is optimized for still air and no additional cooling at all.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Said told us, that...
>>>>> 
>>>>>> ...a fan is about the worst thing you can do for your Z3805 it will
>>>>> significantly worsen the stability of the output frequency...
>>>>> 
>>>>> Since the main task of the OCXO-oven is to stabilize the internal 
>>>>> temperature, I can't imagine, that it get's into trouble when not 
>>>>> externally cooled!?
>>>>> 
>>>>> If I'd ventilate the air around the OCXO case the heater had to work more 
>>>>> and the power dissipation would be greater.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Am I wrong with taht?
>>>>> 
>>>>> Volker
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Am 16.12.2012 15:35, schrieb Bob Camp:
>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> By far the most common way to test and certify OCXO's is in moving air. 
>>>>>> It's rare to see one get in trouble from to much ventilation. The more 
>>>>>> common problem is thermal runaway due to inadequate ventilation.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Bob
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Dec 16, 2012, at 7:57 AM, Volker Esper<[email protected]>  wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Steward,
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> What is the intended and what is the actual supply voltage? Which 
>>>>>>> current is the unit consuming?
>>>>>>> When we know that, we can compare the power consumption with our units. 
>>>>>>> If it is in the same range, it should - with a little luck - be working 
>>>>>>> properly.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> My two units are intended to be supplied by 19.5 to 30 V. I use 24 V 
>>>>>>> and the Z3805s draw 0.9 A each. If I increase voltage the current 
>>>>>>> decreases (typical for the switching supplies inside the Z3805).
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I don't cool the units, they just lie on an old electronics magazine 
>>>>>>> (for not to scratch the case of my signal generator, lying below the 
>>>>>>> magazine), so they can freely convect their heat.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Cheers
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Volker
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Am 12.12.2012 01:21, schrieb Stewart Cobb:
>>>>>>>> This may be a newbie question, but I'm a newbie, so:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Do the HP telecom GPSDOs (Z38xx) require external airflow for cooling?
>>>>>>>> They don't have built-in fans, but they sorta look like they depend on 
>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>> rack-level cooling fan, which a telecom rack would almost certainly 
>>>>>>>> have.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> I ask because I bought a Z3816 awhile back which worked for about a 
>>>>>>>> week
>>>>>>>> and then failed. I traced the failure to an internal power supply 
>>>>>>>> brick,
>>>>>>>> which had a big finned heat-sink attached but nevertheless smelled
>>>>>>>> overheated and was shorted internally.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> I never found a replacement power brick, and I don't have time to mess 
>>>>>>>> with
>>>>>>>> it right now, so I recently bought a Z3805A. It, too, looks like it's
>>>>>>>> working, but it started to feel awfully warm after a few hours, so I
>>>>>>>> unplugged it for now.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> It probably wouldn't take much of a fan to bring the internal 
>>>>>>>> temperature
>>>>>>>> down close to ambient, and the fan could be powered easily enough from 
>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>> supply rails. But that might create a temperature gradient where the
>>>>>>>> designers didn't intend one. Or it might cause problems I don't even 
>>>>>>>> know
>>>>>>>> about yet.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> At the moment, the Z3805A is in a fan-less 19-inch rack with a bunch of
>>>>>>>> other equipment, in a lab environment. Should it have its own fan?
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Cheers!
>>>>>>>> --Stu
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected]
>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, go to 
>>>>>>>> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
>>>>>>>> and follow the instructions there.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected]
>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, go to 
>>>>>>> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
>>>>>>> and follow the instructions there.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected]
>>>>>> To unsubscribe, go to 
>>>>>> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
>>>>>> and follow the instructions there.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected]
>>>>> To unsubscribe, go to 
>>>>> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
>>>>> and follow the instructions there.
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected]
>>>> To unsubscribe, go to 
>>>> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
>>>> and follow the instructions there.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected]
>>> To unsubscribe, go to 
>>> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
>>> and follow the instructions there.
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected]
>> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
>> and follow the instructions there.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected]
> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected]
> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.


_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Reply via email to