And folks, please respect Brooks' privacy -- remember that this list is archived in many places on the web.

John
----
paul swed said the following on 12/21/2012 04:06 PM:
Kind of defocusing here. I think the thread is about possibly helping to
release the shera v4.02 software. Several folks appear to be local to
Brooks wife and may be able to help her recover information she may need in
general and if we are lucky allow the software to be at least gathered.
Regards
Paul
WB8TSL

On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 3:30 PM, David Kirkby <david.kir...@onetel.net>wrote:

On 21 December 2012 18:11, Chris Albertson <albertson.ch...@gmail.com>
wrote:
I think whatthis says is that if you've worked hard to make a design
available to others and you don't intend to sell it commercially,
PUBLISH the details, the design files and the source code.   Yes I
kknow it is never "good enough" for others to see.  But in reality it
is likely better than what 99.9%  of others can do.

I agree if you don't want to sell it, then make it public, even if it
is not "finished"

That said, some of the ****  code that people release, and gets
circulated annoys me.  Take a look at this unix shell script,


http://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/kirkby/bad-code/sympow-1.018.1.p7/src/Configure

or the C code in the same directory


http://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/kirkby/bad-code/sympow-1.018.1.p7/src/


But another issue is that sometimes people DO want to make money from
their code. In that case, they want to keep it secret (as Bruce did).
But I supect in many cases they would probably agree to it being made
public in the event of their death or them becoming incapacitated.
Code like Bruch wrote is unlikely to be commerically useful to his
family, so he might as well make it public. But it may be too late.

I wonder if there is a technical solution to this. You encrypt your
secret source code, giving the encrypted code to anyone that wants it.
You give 3 people you trust part of the decryption key. Any two parts
are sufficient to decrypt the code. Would something like that be
acceptable to individuals that make money from code, but don't
realistically believe it will survice commerically without them.


Dave

_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Reply via email to