Hmmm... . That puts a different face on it. If it a LORAN-like signal, but with an eventual format, incompatible with existing hardware, like the Austron 2100F, any cheering will have been in vain.
YMMV, -John ================== > I understand its no eLORAN, but I keep calling it LORAN and thats actually > just as wrong. > Not sure what to call it. It does at least at this point work with the old > rcvrs. > It turned off at 2000 UTC Friday it was time for a beer. > Regards > Paul. > > On Sat, Feb 2, 2013 at 6:14 PM, Magnus Danielson > <[email protected] >> wrote: > >> On 02/02/2013 09:34 PM, Bob Camp wrote: >> >>> Hi >>> >>> Is there any sign that the signal actually *is* eLORAN at this point? >>> >> >> The published spec makes it non eLORAN but rather a new fresher signal. >> >> Anyone tried grabbing the new signal? >> >> Cheers, >> Magnus >> >> ______________________________**_________________ >> time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected] >> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/** >> mailman/listinfo/time-nuts<https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts> >> and follow the instructions there. >> > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe, go to > https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. > > _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
