On 03/25/2013 09:36 AM, Jim Lux wrote:
> One reason is that if one DOES release source, one will wind up > supporting it, because generally, we all nice people and helpful, and > it's hard to tell someone no when they send an email asking how to get > it to compile on Version N+3 when you used version N, etc. This can be > a real distraction from whatever else you are doing. Boy, you can say that again. And open source hardware is even worse. A couple of years ago I put up an open source induction heater on my site. Everything included - schematics, board layouts, CAD files, theory of operation, how to wind the transformer - in short, everything I could think of. There's even a kit available from Fluxeon.com. Yet I probably spend an hour a day responding to emails about that project. Approximately 100% of the questions are either answered on my site or by a little googling. It's getting to be enough of a burden that I'm considering taking the page down. I'm a dedicated supporter of Open Source but this experience has tempered my enthusiasm a bit. > And then there's the folks who argue with you about your implementation > or coding style. Or electrical design style. I think that the people who want to argue design, especially "what if I did this?" type arguments are more tiresome than the software know-it-alls. People need to really think and do their Google homework before hitting the email button on a project site. John -- John DeArmond Tellico Plains, Occupied TN http://www.fluxeon.com <-- THE source for induction heaters http://www.neon-john.com <-- email from here http://www.johndearmond.com <-- Best damned Blog on the net PGP key: wwwkeys.pgp.net: BCB68D77 _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
