On 1/24/14 11:57 AM, Volker Esper wrote:
Nice! I didn't know that. But what a number, 300... Why such a
digital-hostile factor? Why not 256 or 512?
Volker
Am 24.01.2014 20:51, schrieb [email protected]:
9.8304 MHz divided by 300 is 32,768 Hz.
Feed that to an electronic clock and you will have an atomic clock of sorts.
Regards
9.8304 is 300 baud * 32768. So you can generate all the conventional
digital data rates (1200,2400,.., 38.4k with powers of two). Typically,
a UART wants to see a clock that is 16x or 8x bit time, so you need
something a bit higher.
_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
