Magnus, The good thing about Lars posting his code is that if you think you see an improvement you can make it and test your idea. I intend to start doing just that but Chinese parts take about 30 days to get here and I'll just have to wait. My first steps will be to make the software vary easy to understand, to verify and modify. I'll likely post my version to GitHub.
BTW I think "P" terms do integrate in a way because it's a correction term you apply to the current DAC value. The current DAC value is the sum of all the corrections in the past. So it may look like integration. With luck this could snowball. If it works well more people will use it and with more users, some of them will think of improvements that make it work better. On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 12:29 PM, Magnus Danielson <[email protected]> wrote: > Hej Lars, > > Impressive build in all it's simplicity. > > Your filtering equations look strange. > Rather than having a PI loop it looks like both the P and I branch > integrates. I'm also unclear about the loop gain changes by the pre-filter > averager. > > Will have to look more at your code. > > Cheers, > Magnus > -- Chris Albertson Redondo Beach, California _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
