[email protected] said: > Thanks for the response. I've got a UT+ in the parts box. But that's not > the problem I'm trying to solve. I'm trying to make the best GPSDO that I > can make using a nav receiver at the moment. Call it an obsession if you > like. It's OK if I don't have corrections to the nanosecond for each PPS. > But I can see the nav receiver wandering around; especially on cloudy days, > (the antenna is in the attic, so that's about the best I can do for that) > and it just seems to me that I should be able to do a general correction for > nav position errors. Sorry if my naive posts are starting to get on > people's nerves.
If I was doing something like that, I'd skip the samples where the location was outside a range rather than trying to correct. (even if the GPS marked them as "good") And maybe skip several samples each side of the ones out of range. If you have a good reference, you should be able to collect some data and see how it looks. -- These are my opinions. I hate spam. _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
