Wow, if 1 second in 300 million years is correct, that's around 1 E-16th.
M


On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 2:51 PM, Edesio Costa e Silva <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Full story at
> http://www.nist.gov/pml/div688/nist-f2-atomic-clock-040314.cfm
>
> Edésio
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected]
> To unsubscribe, go to
> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.
>
_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Reply via email to