On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 6:52 AM, Brian Lloyd <[email protected]> wrote:
> ..., additional antenna cable introduces a fixed > delay value and hence a fixed constant that gets added to each path > regardless of direction. It seems to me that this would produce a much > "fuzzier" solution to position and/or variation in timing. Knowing cable > length and propagation velocity, would allow the software to subtract that > constant from all ranges and thus provide a more correct position and time > solution. Is this not the case? > > I think you have it exactly correct. The antenna location determines the geometry and the cable length adds only a fixed offset. Many GPS receivers have a command where you can tell them a "cable delay". But also you have to think about the other end of this. How long is the cable that is used for the output FROM the GPS receiver. This cable introduces a delay also. You might even have a distribution amplifier of at least a TTL chip acting as a driver or maybe a MAX232 chip doing level conversion. There is a total system delay. But really this only matters if you are keeping absolute time of day. Delay does not mater for frequency measurement or for time interval measurement. -- Chris Albertson Redondo Beach, California _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
