-------- In message <[email protected]>, Magnus Danielson writes:
>I'm just saying that the NTP processing and the NTP monitoring may not >need to run by the same daemon necessarily. As the Varnish architecture shows, I'm fully in agreement with this. I should also add that one of the reasons I don't like the control mode packets is that they are complex. I have no issues with handling the standard 48 byte fixed format, no strings NTP timing packets in a root-process, but in todays environment it would not be OK to design a daemon which handles the crypto stuff or the control packets in a root-process, those should go in a sandbox. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 [email protected] | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
