Hi Dave, as a long time reader (since 1955) and subscriber I remember the Amateur scientist pages ending in the 1980s. I think the contributer retired. At around that time I think the many adherents formed the Society of Amateur Scientists. Though I have not visited fot several years the web site was www.sas.org and I believe had pdfs of old SciAm Amateur Scientist articles.

I particularly remember one scary article about an X-ray generator that consisted of a 6J5G tube ( I think a triode valve in the UK :-)) ) with a piece of aluminium foil secured round the smaller diameter part of the top with a twist of copper wire, and conected between the cathode pin and the foil, a 2kV psu !! The end of the tube cathode (and heater wire) was clearly visible through the top and formed a spot source of electrons. I believe an X-ray plate of a hand was included in the article !!

There were many inovative ways of building quite sophisticated experiments. Another I rememver was a Proton precession magnetometer using a radar magnetron magnet.

Alan
G3NYK



----- Original Message ----- From: "paul swed" <[email protected]> To: "Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement" <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2014 1:20 PM
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] 1968 Scientific American Magazine: Cesium ClockStandards


Dave I do not know why but it was one of two things as I barely recall.
Magazine format change (Need dumber for more readers) or the fellow died.
That was a long time ago.
I know as a kid that inspired me on more then one occasion to do something.
They are still a good read. there was some pdfs at some sight or a book or
something.
Regards
Paul
WB8TSL

On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 6:16 AM, Dr. David Kirkby (Kirkby Microwave Ltd) <
[email protected]> wrote:

I see this on eBay - it might interest some, and at $10 it will not
break the bank


http://www.ebay.ca/itm/1968-Scientific-American-Magazine-Cesium-Clock-Standards-Measurement-DNA-Dis-/381078816062

BTW, does anyone know why the Amateur Scientist column was dropped in
Scientific American? Perhaps the thought they might get sued if a
suggestion was made to use anything more dangerous than a teaspoon of
salt!

Dave
_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.

_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Reply via email to