On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 10:27 AM, Dan Drown <[email protected]> wrote:

> Is this better or worse than other NTP server platforms?  I haven't tested
> them, so I have no idea.


Tharp says his appliance

"can sustain thousands of queries per second. Even under high throughput
timekeeping operations are never disrupted or perturbed."

But enough of that.

>From the time-nut perspective what's the interest in high resolution NTP?
I mean beyond the "can I do this?" appeal.
_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Reply via email to