This seems to be turning into a rabbit hole from which there can be no possible 
return.  With no evidence, you question my competence and cast aspersions on my 
testing methodology.  I give up.  

Have a nice day.

Bob -----------------------------------------------------------------
AE6RV.com

GFS GPSDO list:
groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/GFS-GPSDOs/info

      From: Azelio Boriani <azelio.bori...@gmail.com>
 To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement <time-nuts@febo.com> 
 Sent: Saturday, November 5, 2016 7:02 PM
 Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Thermal impact on OCXO
   
...with a 20bit DAC, a suitable voltage reference for that DAC and an HP3458...

On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 12:39 AM, Bob Stewart <b...@evoria.net> wrote:
> Hi Hal,
>
> With a 20 bit DAC, even a small aging rate is going to show up.  I'll let the 
> one GPSDO cook for a month or so and see what it shows then.  I'll also pull 
> the data from the log file and see if I can see any correlation between the 
> temperature and the EFC over time.  IOW, for data points separated by 3.5 
> days, does the temperature difference between the two point seem to play a 
> large part of the change in the recorded DAC value.
>
> The graph was made from the logging data sent to the PC.  But, the firmware 
> doesn't have access to historical data on the PC, so something is needed for 
> aging calculations.  Tom mentioned here recently about the 58503A GPSDO 
> saving 64 hours of data for it's aging calculations.  So, I just added a few 
> hours to that to get to 3.5 days of history in the GPSDO.
> Bob -----------------------------------------------------------------
> AE6RV.com
>
> GFS GPSDO list:
> groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/GFS-GPSDOs/info
>
>      From: Hal Murray <hmur...@megapathdsl.net>
>  To: Bob Stewart <b...@evoria.net>
> Cc: Hal Murray <hmur...@megapathdsl.net>
>  Sent: Saturday, November 5, 2016 6:23 PM
>  Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Thermal impact on OCXO
>
>> The OCXO has been hot for a number of months.
>
> Then I don't understand why it is still aging that much.
>
>
>> I changed the firmware to save the DAC voltage every 30 minutes for 3.5
>> day
>
> That's not very long.
>
> How did you make the graph?  You had to get the data out to a place where you
> can plot it somehow.  If you can do that, why are you "saving" the data?  I
> assume you have a serial port to a PC or something like that.
>
>
>> The fuzz in the temperature line is, indeed, the HVAC cycling
>
> You could try putting a box over the unit to see if that slows down the
> temperature changes.
>
> Mostly, you are trying to block air flow.
>
>
>
> --
> These are my opinions.  I hate spam.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.
_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


   
_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Reply via email to