On 8/13/18 6:10 AM, Bob kb8tq wrote:
Hi

Ok, this is Time Nuts. We probably have a pretty good sample of those who use 
this and that as a source of time.
We also are reasonably conscious about what we are doing. NIST’s claimed reason 
for running WWV (and WWVH) is to
distribute accurate time and frequency.

Would / does anybody on the list actually use WWV as their *primary* source of 
accurate time or accurate frequency?


I don't use WWV (or WWVH) as a source of time/frequency per-se - what I use it for is as a beacon at a known power, frequency, and antenna pattern, with (presumably) very good close in phase noise.

The ionosphere has a coherence time of a few seconds, so ADEV of the source at tau of 10 sec or longer isn't a huge thing for me. But that 1 Hz/1 sec time frame is of real interest.

As the receiver flies over, we get nice soundings "through" the ionosphere with good performance in the short term.

The usual ionosondes don't have anywhere near the same carrier purity, and, because they sweep, you have to have good time synchronization of your super het receiver to make sure you can tune the signal.

With WWV, I can set my center frequency to, say, 10.005 MHz, record 25 kHz BW for several minutes as I fly over and make my measurements. The "phase noise and ADEV" of my receiver position is very small - zipping along 500 km at the top of the ionosphere, there's not a lot of bumps in the road, so it's easy to model the position.

Not for my current spacecraft, but for a future one (SunRISE), we'll be measuring (post processed) spacecraft position and time to a few ns. The current one isn't that good - but for this one, we're interested in the lumps and bumps of the ionosphere, and that's a "over time spans of <3 seconds" kind of measurement.


That said, if WWV were to turn off tomorrow, I could probably build a ground beacon with adequate performance to do my science. I don't need kilowatts of radiated power - it's just convenient that WWV exists and someone else does it. And in reality, I'd rather have an antenna which radiates more "up" than "out" - WWV and WWVH are vertical dipoles - good for skywave propagation, not so hot for vertical sounding.





_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe, go to 
http://lists.febo.com/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts_lists.febo.com
and follow the instructions there.

Reply via email to