> It's worse than that, not just WWV, WWVH, but also WWVB: > Just as idle speculation, I wonder how many time-nuts it would take to maintain WWVB service. One in each large city, perhaps, running a few milliwatts into a long wire, driven from a suitable GNSS-to-WWVB bridge. The domain edges might have some low-signal regions due to interference among the multiple coherent sources. (Disclaimer: this message for entertainment purposes only.)
Cheers, Peter _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe, go to http://lists.febo.com/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts_lists.febo.com and follow the instructions there.
