To All, OK - I'll throw this out there -
What if we do something with AREDN and establish our own service? We won't need 'cloud burners' to do an approach that way; and we will be able to solve two problems at once. For those that may not be aware, AREDN info can be found here: https://www.arednmesh.org/ The more nodes we have; the better. We could run our own time service this way for not a lot of wattage per person; even run off of solar. I have a 5V to 24V/48V design that can run one of these radios for at least a day off of a USB storage battery that is solar charged; so past the initial investment it would run provided the battery was charged. Something to think about. 73's, John AJ6BC On Mon, Aug 20, 2018 at 4:39 PM, jimlux <[email protected]> wrote: > On 8/20/18 4:17 PM, ew via time-nuts wrote: > > <snip> > > They're cutting a lot more than WWV/WWVH/WWVB - they're cutting 300+ folks > in the labs doing all sorts of things. > > Download the doc that Rick posted the link to, go to page NIST-24 and > start reading.. > > I don't know enough about how the labs are organized to know if any time > standards measurement and development (e.g. the next generation atomic > clocks) is on the chopping block. > > They're meeting and exceeding all their performance targets (end of the > doc) - about twice as many CRADAs as the target, Journal impact factor is > >1.7 > > > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe, go to http://lists.febo.com/mailman/ > listinfo/time-nuts_lists.febo.com > and follow the instructions there. > _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe, go to http://lists.febo.com/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts_lists.febo.com and follow the instructions there.
