Hi At least the HP boxes run through a series of filter settings and do a pretty good job of handling the “lack” of SA. The one thing that is very apparent in the TDEV data on the 3801 is the lack of sawtooth correction. I suppose you could call that a SA optimization that no longer is on the “good idea” list.
Bob > On Dec 9, 2018, at 5:13 PM, Poul-Henning Kamp <[email protected]> wrote: > > -------- > In message <FE97A647F0D845F19BAA879F646EEC1D@pc52>, "Tom Van Baak" writes: >>> Tom is currently working his magic on the raw data captures with Timelab. >>> The results so far are looking very good and much more informative. >> >> Mark's experiment was nicely done. Here's the first set of TimeLab plots: >> >> http://leapsecond.com/u/sims/gpsdo17/ >> >> If that's too much, just look at the last 2 or 4 plots on that page, >> arranged by worse than average and better than average. >> I'll fix a couple of typos and add missing data for two of the GPSDO. > > I wonder how many of these still run with SA optimized PLL time constants ? > > > -- > Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 > [email protected] | TCP/IP since RFC 956 > FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe > Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe, go to > http://lists.febo.com/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts_lists.febo.com > and follow the instructions there. _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe, go to http://lists.febo.com/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts_lists.febo.com and follow the instructions there.
