-------- In message <1D93794F4BC1422BB065B2EF8C431AFF@pc52>, "Tom Van Baak" writes:
>> So intended for setting the display of a human readable clock face, not >> "time-nuttery" class performance. > >That's likely true, but if someone finds that the latency or jitter >is systematic and if several of us determine they are consistent, >board-to-board and city-to-city, then we can simply apply hard-coded >corrections in s/w. The really interesting experiment is running two of them next to each other, and see if the IRQ timing varies between them, and if so, how it does. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 [email protected] | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe, go to http://lists.febo.com/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts_lists.febo.com and follow the instructions there.
