Hi The F9T seems to really like the 4072.1 “uBlox” message. Since you can only get that from an F9T …. that’s that. Of course if you are not looking for the differential timing mode, that may not be a big deal.
Probably of more interest than the base / rover timing is the dual frequency ionosphere correction. At least from the flags that does seem to be working. The data plot was (just like the F9P data earlier) from a sawtooth corrected output provided by LH. I have every reason to believe ( = it says so in the docs ) that the issue is a firmware fault and in no way LH’s. Bob > On Mar 23, 2019, at 5:46 PM, Mark Sims <hol...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > Was that from the sawtooth corrected or the raw data? It would be very > interesting to compare the two values from the same run. > > And, alas, as we are finding out, the F9T does not seem to accept RTCM > corrections from F9P (or other) GPS/NTRIP devices. The F9T seems to use > only its own special timing correction messages. > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to > http://lists.febo.com/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts_lists.febo.com > and follow the instructions there. _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com To unsubscribe, go to http://lists.febo.com/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts_lists.febo.com and follow the instructions there.
