> Well part of it comes from designing, testing, and manufacturing a few > thousand OCXO designs over the years. We likely built 10’s of millions of > OCXO’s over the time I was doing / managing that. It might be just my personal opinion but credential swinging is better left out of technical discussion. > > - high-Q crystals require SC-cut > ... An SC has a lower Q than an AT of similar size > and design up to the point acoustic Q losses completely take over. > If you are talking about sub 20 MHz OCXO’s with “doable” crystal > package sizes, the AT will have the higher Q by a significant margin.
Could you please back up this claim with verifiable facts? Leo _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe, go to http://lists.febo.com/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts_lists.febo.com and follow the instructions there.
