Hi

Well, you need to leave a lot out to keep it brief. 

The answer is “somewhere in the 1x10^-10 to 1x10^-11 range. As long as you
are not stating a tau or a confidence factor, any number in that range could be
right. 

=====

Based on having done this a lot of times there are a couple of ways to present 
the
numbers.

1) Fractions of a hertz. Since you get into mili and micro pretty fast, along 
with a bunch
of decimals this can indeed loose people pretty fast. If the environment is one 
where
multiple frequencies will be used / considered / discussed, fractions of a 
hertz gets 
a bit crazy.

2) Scientific notation. Obviously, this is a common choice. Since the exponent 
is ever 
changing it also can tangle people up,

3) Engineering notation. *IF* everything can be kept in one magic range, this 
usually 
works best. Talking about 100 ppt and 0.1 ppt ( or ppb or ppm) seems to get the 
point
across without generating an enormous disconnect. You have one discussion about 
what a ppt is and then move on.

…. back to gazing out over lovely Loveland CO. 

Bob

> On Oct 2, 2019, at 12:32 PM, David Van Horn via time-nuts 
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> I'm writing up a presentation for some sales guys, and I need the typical 
> frequency error of the thunderbolt in marketing friendly terms like "plus or 
> minus X millihertz"
> 
> What would that number be?   Short term only.
> 
> --
> David VanHorn
> Lead Hardware Engineer
> 
> Backcountry Access, Inc.
> 2820 Wilderness Pl, Unit H
> Boulder, CO  80301 USA
> phone: 303-417-1345  x110
> email: 
> [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected]
> To unsubscribe, go to 
> http://lists.febo.com/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts_lists.febo.com
> and follow the instructions there.


_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe, go to 
http://lists.febo.com/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts_lists.febo.com
and follow the instructions there.

Reply via email to