From: Fiorenzo Cattaneo
[]
GPS and GLONASS are the best GNSS around, they are operated by the
military as a military operation and have the best reliability record.
Beidu is fairly new, and Galileo is operated by civlian agencies.
They've had major operational issues. So this leaves GPS and GLONASS.
GLONASS tends to have better coverage on the polar regions, but
otherwise I think GPS is better, and GPS has better time and space
accuracy. Although I'm not that with the accuracy of RS232 interrupt
handling it would be possible to even tell the time differenbce.
between UTS(GPS) and UTC(GLONASS).
I'm not even sure than running GLONASS and GPS together will give you
a better time solution, although it will definitely improve
availability.
=======================================
GPS, GLONASS and Galileo have /all/ had operational difficulties, and
possibly BeiDou too. For precision timekeeping Galileo has the best
on-board sources, but using GPS and Galileo is perhaps the best combination
of accuracy and reliability. The offset between GPS time and UTC, and
Galileo time and UTC is regularly reported (possibly in the satellite feed
itself). It's nanoseconds, and very unlikely to affect a system using a PPS
signal from a typical amateur cost source.
I think you underrate Galileo, certainly in suggesting GLONASS above
Galileo.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6308660/
https://www.itnews.com.au/news/satellite-failure-caused-global-gps-timing-anomaly-414237
https://www.theverge.com/2019/7/15/20694395/europe-galileo-satellite-navigation-system-offline-outage-technical-incident
Cheers,
David
--
SatSignal Software - Quality software for you
Web: http://www.satsignal.eu
Email: [email protected]
Twitter: @gm8arv
_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe, go to
http://lists.febo.com/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts_lists.febo.com
and follow the instructions there.
