On Fri, 10 April 2020 14:31:53 -0700 Rick wrote:

>At this time, I will give my usual speech about IMHO the fact that

>since the invention of the DDS on a chip, EFC should no longer be used

>for high performance oscillators.

During my 50 years in the electronics industry I have always been puzzled about 
one aspect of crystal oscillators. They go to great lengths to use a precise 
piece of quartz as the heart, because of its unique properties, and then add 
standard external components - capacitors, varactors, Zeners, etc. to tweak its 
frequency. All these components vary far more than the original piece of quartz 
... hence my confusion.

I know it is practically impossible to grind a crystal to exactly the frequency 
you want, and it then drifts over time, but what is the logic of using 
relatively wildly varying components to adjust the quartz? Are their 
temperature and ageing characteristics swamped by the superior crystal?

In all the papers I have ever read, the subject is never mentioned ... you just 
add a variable capacitor and/or an EFC circuit and job done.

I guess this is showing my total ignorance here, but I would like to know.

Maybe this is at the heart of Rick's usual speech?

John


_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe, go to 
http://lists.febo.com/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts_lists.febo.com
and follow the instructions there.

Reply via email to