Hi It also *very* much depends on the stability of your local reference and the stability of the ionosphere. Unless both are “pretty darn good” a hundred second integration is utter nonsense
Bob > On Jul 31, 2020, at 5:00 PM, Poul-Henning Kamp <[email protected]> wrote: > > -------- > Bob kb8tq writes: > >> The WWVB modulation is *very* predictable. Once you have lock, >> you can guess just about every phase reversal you will see. >> [...] >> The point of this being that you *could* pre-flip the data before it >> went into a buffer. That way the buffer integration time constant >> could be quite long. > > I would just use two buffers and decide which one based on the > prediction, that way DC-offsets will not cause trouble. > > -- > Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 > [email protected] | TCP/IP since RFC 956 > FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe > Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe, go to http://lists.febo.com/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts_lists.febo.com and follow the instructions there.
