On 8/10/20 11:45 AM, paul swed wrote:
Hello to the group. Have been looking forward to seeing how the STM32 SDR project might be going. SDR is a weak spot for me. So been reading. And believe the answer is that a SDR solution may work for AM code and even BPSK code to an extent. But doesn't the sampling destroy the quality of the incoming signal for establishing a locked reference?
Not really. Consider you want to know the phase of a sinewave, and you're sampling at 3.5321 samples/cycle (i.e. it doesn't have to be integer samples/cycle). You can solve for the phase of the sinewave to any level of precision, limited essentially by the SNR of the samples (including any quantization effects).
You can do this repeatedly - and implement all you need in terms of a phase locked loop - entirely in the digital domain.
As it happens, some things are *easier* if you, for instance sample at 4 times the frequency of the input signal - various clock rate noises alias to places that are not near the input signal.
So, sample with enough bits, digitally filter, run your PLL, and you can conceivably steer your processor's VCXO to be in a fixed frequency relationship with the input.(and maybe phase).
This is essentially what we do with modern deep space transponders - we digitize the received uplink signal (actually, at the IF), run that through a PLL tracking loop using the frequency error term to drive a DDS which generates the downlink signal. So we can keep the transmit frequency exactly at 880/749*receive frequency (For X-band, anyway).
There is some arithmetic involved to make sure that all the ratios come out right - and some design involved to make sure that errors (i.e. noise on the reference oscillator, which is fixed frequency) cancel appropriately.
The previous generation of transponders did a quasi digital PLL - the IF was digitized and processed to generate an error signal, which was then used to push the VCTCXO around - so the reference frequency was always a fixed fraction of the receive frequency (usually around 78-80MHz, for historical reasons). Then the transmit side just multiplied the oscillator up.
_______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe, go to http://lists.febo.com/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts_lists.febo.com and follow the instructions there.
