Regarding linear versus SMPS, I always prefer linear where possible. As others have said, for assessing a SMPS, try it and see. If it does the job sufficiently without too much noise, then go with it.

Regarding Rb cooling, I don't know about the newer, smaller ones - I only have three big old Efratom M-100s - but if they have provision for heatsink or chassis cooling, then use it. The MTBF info Neville put up shows the benefit. As far as I know, the "ambient" temperature sometimes seen in Rb specs is actually the base plate temperature, assuming use of a heatsink large enough that they are roughly the same.

Each of my M-100s came with a very nice black-anodized, extruded Al heatsink, perfectly fitted, hardware-wise. In my portable reference project, I put the Rb on the inside of the Al back panel, and the heatsink opposite on the outside, for convection cooling, and of course, a generous film of conductive goop between each interface surface. The screws go through the heatsink and back panel, into the base plate, so in reality, the back panel is just pinched in between.

The other two units are planned to be together in a dual system, with both mounted on a single, heavy Al plate, which is mounted on rubber isolation hardware. The thermal plan is to surround everything except the plate with foam sheet insulation, and let them self-heat to something a bit above the highest expected ambient temperature - maybe 40-42 deg C. When this range is reached, a variable speed blower will feed cooling air to the plate through ducting, to provide some degree of temperature regulation, depending on how well I design the arrangement and its control system, and squeeze everything into the limited space. In anticipation of too cold an ambient temperature, there are also heater resistors on the plate for just in case, and of course a thermal cutout switch to shut it all down if things go very wrong. Fans and blowers are the weakest link in this sort of stuff.

This is all experimental, and only partially built, into an old rack style HP instrument carcass. Some day I may finish it. The best approach though, would be true regulation at some lower temperature for better MTBF, like with TEC heat/cool capability, but this gets to be much bigger and more complicated.

Ed

_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe, go to 
http://lists.febo.com/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts_lists.febo.com
and follow the instructions there.

Reply via email to