Hi

> On Nov 22, 2020, at 2:40 AM, Tom Van Baak <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Hi Skip,
> 
> The input menu for both TimeLab and Stable32 allow you to set tau0 and also 
> the phase scaling factor. Given your choice of frequencies your sample rate 
> will be 10 Hz, so set tau to 0.1 s. And, yes, the scaling factor will be 5 
> MHz / 10 Hz or 5e5. Both tools expect the scaling to be a multiplier (not a 
> divisor) and so use 1/5e5 which is 2e-6.
> 
> Now, a word of caution. Do not make a plot that blindly goes down to 1e-17 or 
> 1e-19 or 1e-20. That's likely wrong.
> 
> There are several ways to test your DMTD. One of best ways is to measure two 
> oscillators for which you already know the ADEV. For example, if you happen 
> to have two fine OCXO with ADEV (tau 1 s) of 3.0e-13 and 4.0e-13 then the 
> expected stability measurement will be 5e-13. [1]
> 
> If your DMTD reports 5e-13 then well done! On the other hand, if you get the 
> "wrong answer" then there's a problem with your actual sample rate, or your 
> scaling factor, or too much noise in your offset oscillator, or problems with 
> your ZCD or TIC, or you have internal noise in your DMTD. If the latter then 
> re-try the test using two oscillators with poorer stability. At some point 
> you will find a pair of oscillators for which your DMTD results agree 
> perfectly with known values, or values measured using other comparators or 
> counters that you have lying around.
> 
> A temptation is to put the "same signal" into both inputs and see  how low 
> the "noise floor" is. For several reasons this can lead to bogus conclusions. 
> It would be like building a DIY voltmeter and testing its accuracy, 
> stability, linearity, and resolution by how well it reports "0.0 volts" when 
> you short the inputs.

If you put a chunk of cable into one leg of the drive circuit, you will get a 
much more rational 
measure of the noise floor on a DMTD. You want to “explore” the region from 
about 15 degrees
of phase shift out to 180 degrees. ( If using a time tagger like the TICC ).  
The reason is fairly 
simple. The Reference oscillator cancels out very will at “zero degrees”. As 
you go to longer and
longer delays ( this ultimately is a 10 Hz phase shift ) the correlation / 
dropout degrades. 

Yes, there are other issues, but this at least gets you into the ballpark 

Bob


> 
> So get some 1e-9, 1e-11, 1e-13 sources and see how well your DMTD reports 
> their actual stability. Do some short-term runs (say, tau 0.1 s to 100 s) and 
> mid-term runs (say, tau 100 s to tau 1 d). You may run into other interesting 
> problems along the way so stay in touch.
> 
> In the end you should have a reliable instrument that's trusted at e-13 
> levels. FYI: the timing of your posting is serendipitous since I'm going 
> through the same process this month with a DMTD from Corby.
> 
> /tvb
> 
> [1] In other words the RMS sum, which in this example is the Pythagorean 
> triple 3:4:5 so rms(3,4) = sqrt(3^2 + 4^2) = 5.
> 
> 
> On 11/21/2020 1:44 PM, Skip Withrow wrote:
>> Hello Time-Nuts,
>> 
>> I have made significant progress on a DMTD instrument, and hope to be
>> making measurements relatively soon.  However, I have a question on
>> getting the correct results.
>> 
>> I have a box with DUT(5MHz), OFFSET (4.999990 MHz), and REF (5MHz)
>> inputs, with DUT and REF outputs that will feed my 5370B TIC.  My
>> understanding is that I gain an increase in resolution of 5x10E6 Hz/10
>> Hz = 5x10E5.  My question is how do I make this display correctly in
>> TimeLab (or Stable32)?
>> 
>> When I use just the 5370B and plot the noise floor (feeding a delayed
>> version of the A input into the B input) I get a nice straight line
>> with -1 slope starting at 1.15x10E-10 at 1sec and going down.With the
>> DMTD connected does this mean that I just put in a scale factor of
>> 5x10E5 in TimeLab (and also change the sample time to 0.1Hz)?
>> 
>> Or, is there a better way to set things up?  Any insight appreciated.
>> 
>> Regards,
>> Skip Withrow
>> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected]
> To unsubscribe, go to 
> http://lists.febo.com/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts_lists.febo.com
> and follow the instructions there.


_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe, go to 
http://lists.febo.com/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts_lists.febo.com
and follow the instructions there.

Reply via email to