Hi This is probably a more “citation worthy” version of the Fluke App note everybody used:
A Test Set for the Accurate Measurement of Phase Noise on High-Quality Signal Sources https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/4313904 Bob > On Dec 17, 2020, at 6:02 AM, Attila Kinali <[email protected]> wrote: > > Good afternoon, > > In the process of writing my thesis I stumbled over the problem > that the definition of what phase noise is in IEEE 1139 is a bit > confusing, to put it mildly. After a short discussion with > Magnus, it seems clear to me that I need to have a better > understanding of how phase noise measurement was done in the > past to properly understand what the standard means to say. > > I think, I have a decent grasp on how modern phase noise analyzer > work, safe for a few details here and there, where they seem to > try to mimic what the old analog analyzers did. > > Before I go on a wild goose chace, I thought I ask here for > advice: Could you point me at as detailed as possible descriptions > on how phase noise analyzers used to work in the purely analog > times? Preferably also as many different approaches as possible. > And, if you are aware of anything that I should have a look at > that might not be obvious to a youngster like me, I would very > much appreciate if you would let me know. > > Thanks in advance > > Attila Kinali > > -- > The driving force behind research is the question: "Why?" > There are things we don't understand and things we always > wonder about. And that's why we do research. > -- Kobayashi Makoto > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe, go to > http://lists.febo.com/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts_lists.febo.com > and follow the instructions there. _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe, go to http://lists.febo.com/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts_lists.febo.com and follow the instructions there.
