--------
Tom Van Baak writes:
>If you do your kernel timekeeping in integers and modulus arithmetic you
>are essentially doing cycle counting and the kernel will keep perfect
>time relative to the external oscillator. So that should be the goal.
>Not e-6, not e-9, not e-10, but perfect cycle counting. Consider this a
>strong plea for someone in both BSD- and Linux- land to pull that off.
But not all of us have masers Tom :-)
Problem is, you still need fractions when NTP tells you that the
X-tal is 7.1PPM off frequency.
When I did timecounters, I tried a couple of things of the sort you
suggest, but when I benchmarked it, a single brutal 64 bit multiply
with a 32bit shift invariably ran faster, had more predictable
latency, worked with any frequency the hardware happened to have
and did NTP's bidding:
http://phk.freebsd.dk/pubs/timecounter.pdf
--
Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
p...@freebsd.org | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
http://lists.febo.com/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts_lists.febo.com
and follow the instructions there.
