Am Sonntag, 10. Januar 2021, 23:07:02 CET schrieb Ben Hall:
> pi@spy-pi:~ $ ntpq -p
>     remote           refid      st t when poll reach   delay   offset  jitter
>============================================================================== 
>*192.168.4.66    .PPS.            1 u   94 1024  377    0.097    0.320   0.081
>+192.168.4.50    .PPS.            1 u  849 1024  377    0.374    0.371   0.072 
>+192.168.4.57    .PPS.            1 u 1071 1024  377    0.341    0.377   0.114
> 
> So perhaps now the NTP loop has converged?  I'm not sure.

The jitter values look better to me now, although I'd still expect them to be 
lower by another factor of 2…3 depending on what your network looks like.  The 
delay values for the last two chimers are in line of what I'd expect, but the 
Teensy delay is really low still.  It would be interesting to find out if it 
really responds that fast or if that value is rather the result of an 
asymmetric delay.  The differences in the displayed offsets seem to indicate 
that the answer is probably be both.  The offset values should also in general 
be quite a bit lower, but that depends on how stable the environment is.  While 
the PLL/FLL is chasing a frequency drift caused by a temperature transient it 
will produce a residual offset that is roughly proportional to the drift rate.


Regards,
Achim.
-- 
+<[Q+ Matrix-12 WAVE#46+305 Neuron microQkb Andromeda XTk Blofeld]>+

SD adaptations for Waldorf Q V3.00R3 and Q+ V3.54R2:
http://Synth.Stromeko.net/Downloads.html#WaldorfSDada




_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe, go to 
http://lists.febo.com/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts_lists.febo.com
and follow the instructions there.

Reply via email to