I think there might be a down side to using more sensitive GNSS receivers, which is that such a receiver will be willing to include more impaired signals in its time and/or position solutions, leading to poorer overall accuracy.
Does anybody know? I certainly concur that good antenna siting is very important, much more so than worrying about a few inches of sway in the mount. Dana On Fri, Jul 23, 2021 at 1:59 AM Hal Murray <halmurray+timen...@sonic.net> wrote: > > > especially for covering the 0-satellite case. > > It's more complicated than just figuring out the error in the satellite's > clock. You also have to consider the error in the satellite orbit, the > difference between where you think it is and where it actually is. > > > > I wish stuff like this could be on a web page or FAQ or something, where > it > > was easily discoverable. > > It's complicated. > > > > This probably comes under tha category of more than you want to know... > > Stanford published a series of lectures on GPS. > https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLGvhNIiu1ubyEOJga50LJMzVXtbUq6CPo > > I think there is a good book or two with enough info to design hardware > and write software. > > -- > These are my opinions. I hate spam. > > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com -- To unsubscribe send > an email to time-nuts-le...@lists.febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to and follow the instructions there. > _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com -- To unsubscribe send an email to time-nuts-le...@lists.febo.com To unsubscribe, go to and follow the instructions there.