Nelson Minar wrote on 18-9-2007 17:05: > Thanks for demonstrating how, in theory, a NAT router can avoid keeping > state for NTP packets if there's manual port forwarding. > > In practice, are cheap consumer routers smart enough to not maintain > state? I'm worried about things like the Linksys WRT54G with stock > firmware. And I'm guessing they're not.
No, cheap consumer routers will probably not do the job. An old 300 MHz PC with some cheap nic's probably will. Jan _______________________________________________ timekeepers mailing list [email protected] https://fortytwo.ch/mailman/cgi-bin/listinfo/timekeepers
