On Fri, 21 Sep 2007, John Pettitt wrote:

>
>> I just wrote an article, it might give you ideas :
>> 
>> "How to find the best stratum 1 NTP servers near you to query for time for 
>> your stratum 2 NTP server"
>> 
>> You can view it here:
>> 
>> http://blogtech.oc9.com/index.php?view=article&id=13%3Ahow-to-find-the-best-ntp-servers-near-you-to-query-for-time-for-ntpd-server&Itemid=1&option=com_content
>> 
>> Comments are welcome !
>>
>>
>>> 
>> 
>> Louis
>> http://blogtech.oc9.com
>> _______________________________________________
>> 
> Louis
>
> Your article is a really bad way to find servers - specifically you are 
> encouraging people to use servers without permission.   This is a bad idea 
> for two reasons
>
> 1) it's rude and may upset server admins to the point of making the servers 
> private
>
> 2) you have no idea if the server is going to be there next week.
>
> There are lists of server maintained by the ntp project and you can ask on 
> email lists like this one and you will find servers you can use without 
> upsetting anybody.
>
> John
>

I just found out that my provider runs a stratum 4 ntp server on their 
mailserver. It is just as good as their stratum 1 servers and it sure 
beats using a stratum 1 global pool server or any far away stratum 1 
server. So you may want to try your ISP mailserver, ftp server, pop 
server, news server, etc. as well to find a very reliable source of time.

This is good news, it shows that some providers DO care. ;-) In this 
scenario (obviously it is intended for their customer use), I would 
encourage you to use your ISP higher stratum servers to be a good net 
citizen. This is what I will do.

remote refid st t when poll reach delay offset jitter
==============================================================================
206.47.60.230 206.47.60.179 4 u 459 1024 377 0.440 0.107 0.460

Louis
http://blogtech.oc9.com
_______________________________________________
timekeepers mailing list
[email protected]
https://fortytwo.ch/mailman/cgi-bin/listinfo/timekeepers

Reply via email to