-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Update, just got a nice little spike an hour or so ago:
http://rikku.vrillusions.com/ntp/ 18.64k clients and 120 packets/sec. And that's at 100mbit netspeed setting. I'm pretty impressed with the new system. I think these very quick bursts will probably be easier on home users than the old system (that from what I recall wasn't really that much of a system), especially since the spikes are going to be much smaller for users on home connection Todd Eddy wrote: > Yeah, bump up your netspeed. When I first joined the pool I somehow > thought that netspeed meant that I would be getting 1.5mb of traffic or > whatever I chose. I guess the old algorythm was essentially if the > netspeed was higher than 768 add the server to the global pool. Now > it's taken into account. I've bumped mine up to 10mbit and I'm seeing > 10k peer spikes now, (the packet count graph got skewed for some > reason). I just upped it to 100mbit and see how things progress along then. > > Nelson Minar wrote: >> Lowell, thanks for your report on your server status a few days ago. I >> crunched some pcap dumps and agree that traffic is looking good. > >> Are we fully on the new DNS system, or still only 3/5 of the DNS servers? > >> I run a server in the US currently set at speed 1.5Mbps. I'm seeing an >> average of 12 requests / second. There are still some spikes up to 100 >> requests / second, about one a day. Eyeballing my graph it looks like a >> spike lasts about 20 minutes. A month ago I was getting more like 30 >> requests / second, with spikes of roughly 200 requests / second. In >> November 2005 I was getting 14 requests / second, but don't have >> measures of spikiness from then. > >> I'm going to crank my connection speed up after awhile, will report on >> how that affects incoming traffic. > >> My server: http://www.pool.ntp.org/scores/72.36.170.170 >> My graphs (not being updated): >> http://www.somebits.com/~nelson/tmp/ntp/ntp.html > > > >> Lowell Hamilton wrote: >>> I would say the new DNS is working great. I rode in on the >>> Slashdotting wave, and traffic was a meager 5-15 packets/sec with 2-3 >>> daily TTNet bursts to 400-500pps until last weekend. >>> >>> Now with the new DNS, more traffic is being sent to those with bigger >>> pipes. I am set to 1000Mbit, and I am seeing a few dozen bursts daily >>> to 150pps with about the same 5-15pps base traffic. Seems to be >>> working like a champ -- at least the load balancing aspect, since the >>> peaks are shorter in length, lower pps, and more frequent. >>> >>> http://www.sl4ck.com/graphs/ntp/ >>> >>> Lowell >>> >>> >>> >>>> Although not as dramatic, the last burst of traffic I saw was a few days >>>> ago. I usually see 1 spike anywhere from a couple times a day to every> >>>> other day. My guess is that slashdot affect (heh, it's actually *good* >>>> this time). That are or the new dns system is working REALLY good :) >>>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> timekeepers mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://fortytwo.ch/mailman/cgi-bin/listinfo/timekeepers >>> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >> _______________________________________________ >> timekeepers mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://fortytwo.ch/mailman/cgi-bin/listinfo/timekeepers > _______________________________________________ timekeepers mailing list [email protected] https://fortytwo.ch/mailman/cgi-bin/listinfo/timekeepers - -- Todd http://www.vrillusions.com/ My PGP Key ID: 0xBC90230C -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFG9/D4iSebwryQIwwRAj+EAKCq2xpVF/Vv3BAXbzkWdg0Y5B0mOwCgjCpt 4YpO0of0MEVdEpmzeZ6oDY8= =d0Fd -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ timekeepers mailing list [email protected] https://fortytwo.ch/mailman/cgi-bin/listinfo/timekeepers
