-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Ask Bjørn Hansen wrote:
> The problem was a "make the resolver smarter" feature that had crept > [2] into some of the lower-level DNS packet wrangling code. So... why aren't you just running a real name server, like BIND 9? - --Michael -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32) iD8DBQFHDG0SuzMQWQwZDN0RArO+AJ44IIxJZA/Iz2vUjYKKHhBE4tADGwCfdW5y Eh28z2PavpU2Wi1b8eF5kks= =vWIM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ timekeepers mailing list [email protected] https://fortytwo.ch/mailman/cgi-bin/listinfo/timekeepers
