On Thursday, November 1, 2007 at 09:05:17 +0100, Adrian von Bidder wrote: >On Thursday 01 November 2007 07.32:15 Adrian von Bidder wrote: >> -140.99.51.115 131.216.1.101 3 u 199 1024 377 164.561 -5.551 >> 0.163 >> -82.94.107.211 20.103.246.37 2 u 814 1024 377 33.680 1.149 >> 89.700 >> -82.94.107.216 154.253.69.230 2 u 859 1024 377 56.304 12.913 >> 65.630
Hmm, that's pretty bad. I think my link to the internet was full at that moment (only 512 kbps). >... and right now: > >-140.99.51.115 148.167.132.200 3 u 731 1024 377 165.243 -5.982 3.761 >-82.94.107.211 20.103.246.37 2 u 321 1024 377 33.480 1.201 0.480 >-82.94.107.216 42.6.118.126 2 u 369 1024 377 34.433 2.945 1.340 Not much worse than the average pool server, I guess. The delay is about the same as the delay that I see in the monitoring system. (I have a small fluctuating offset caused by my DCF77 receiver). >The machine is question is zbasel.fortytwo.ch if you want to keep an eye on >it. I've just restarted it and put prefer on one of the servers to stop the >frequent changes of the primary clock source, so wait 2 or 3 hours until the >results become meaningful again. I'll have a look. Thanks for sending these results. Maurice _______________________________________________ timekeepers mailing list [email protected] https://fortytwo.ch/mailman/cgi-bin/listinfo/timekeepers
